Dear Chip, don’t fire Bill Davis, fire Pat Shurmur.

Yes, the Eagles have given up 90 points in two games. Yes, the Secondary has been appalling as of late. Yes, there has been a complete lack of pass rush and yes, the run Defense has more holes than Augusta National Golf Course.

But firing Bill Davis, a coach who built a secondary that until recently has kept this team alive  is the wrong move…firing a head coach and leaving a system driven team without their innovator for the last five games is a bad move…but firing an Offensive Coordinator who shies away from the media so much we forget his name?  Eh, could work.

Fans are quick to jump to the conclusion that because the Defense allowed 90 points in two games that it should be Davis getting the axe. I may be a lone wolf on this one but honestly, if an axe were to should be in Shurmur’s direction.

If you take away player effort levels and all other contributing factors to concentrate on nothing but play-calling..Offensively, it’s been atrocious.

The first play against the Bucs sums it up. If you can’t remember what it was, have a guess..go on, just a stab in the dark….did you say swing pass?

Screen Shot 2015-11-26 at 22.21.14

Look at how close this was to being intercepted. The Tampa SAFETY stormed down prior to the snap and leapt in the way..ON THE FIRST PLAY OF THE GAME. It’s that same predictability that the team later admitted led to an interception.

The Eagles reportedly simplified the playbook for Sam Bradford. But it’s gotten to the point where we only ever see a handful of plays and the result of that is basically what we saw in week 2 where the Cowboys were able to read and shut down DeMarco Murray..only across the entire Offense.

Receiver’s are unable to get open because the opposing Defense will be familiar with the routes and how much attention to pay certain guys in certain formations. If the Defense sees a certain lineup, they’ll know where the ball is going. But where’s the proof you ask? Just look at how many times Josh Huff was targeted after his touchdown on Sunday. Spoiler alert: 0. Why was this? Because he wasn’t “the intended receiver” on the route which this Offense seems to be built around.

What did Mr Shurmur have to say in response to why the wideouts were getting minimal targets?

“Well, there’s this team in New England that throws the ball a lot inside and I don’t think you’ll hear anybody complain about that,”
– according to this article on Phillymag

The problem runs even deeper than that. One of the most important plays in this Offense is the read-option..only now it appears Sanchez doesn’t read it…and there isn’t an option..he just kind of..hands the ball off and does a little run thinking he’s somehow fooled the Defense.

Sanchez is yet to actually take a read-option this season but the problem is every single time the play occurs, the running back is wrapped up. If he READ the play, there’s acres of space after the linebacker charges after Murray/ why not take it and run? It could be down to the playbook, it could be down to Sanchez but the same happened with Bradford until about two weeks before his injury.

Then there’s the running game that by now needs no introduction. It’s been 11 weeks of the same problems, it’s just that some Defenses highlight them more than others. We have posted so many articles on why the running game has struggled, at this stage we don’t need another. But running the same 5/6 plays doesn’t exactly help.

There’s a lot of criticism about the Defense not adjusting but the  Offense is hardly’s the same swingplays every single drive followed by a Murray run that goes nowhere due to predictability and then an attempted deep pass that often ends up incomplete due to predictable routes.

But the Eagles don’t change things up…in fact the Eagles had SEVEN drives under 2 minutes 30 seconds today and four of those were under a minute…now Chip says time of possession doesn’t matter, it does if you can’t score.

The Offense and Defense are supposed to help eachother out. It’s almost as if they’ve switched roles and it’s the Offense trying and failing miserably to bail out the Defense..only instead of not being able to stop drives defensively, they can’t start them Offensively.

If the Eagles don’t adjust and throw in some different plays (like they did that one time Ryan Mathews scored on a wheel route) then this will be the same story for the rest of the season.

It’s almost as if a conversation after the game goes like this:

Chip: Okay Pat, it’s obvious that we were out-coached this week, like every you think we should change things up?
Pat: Absolutely…what if…..we throw more swing passes?
Chip: Pat, you’re a genius..I knew you were the right man for this job.

Yes the Defense has been bad…but at one point it had two of the top safeties in the NFL and two corners who went on fantastic streaks of not allowing a touchdown. The Offense has been plagued by the same issues since week one.

Now admittedly it is Chip that runs the show Offensively but he can’t fire himself. The team needs a fresh perspective from someone who doesn’t possess a God complex. Pat is basically Chip’s ultimate “yes” man.

If there is any change to come in the coaching staff to assert a point, the finger is being pointed at the wrong man…




3 thoughts on “Dear Chip, don’t fire Bill Davis, fire Pat Shurmur.

  1. Davis ABSOLUTELY needs to be fired. Im sorry I mean no offense, but your opinion is completely asinine to me. He never deserved the job in the first place given his track record as DC of SF and ARZ (a very good superbowl losing defense from just the year before that he ran straight into the ground in just 2 years). It was davis who said fletcher was doing a good job last year and left him one-on-one outside against Dez resulting in 3 easy tds for Dez (just one of dozens and dozens of examples). It wasn’t until Kelly told him to change out fletcher that he finally actually did it. It’s davis who can’t draw up a blitz nor the alternative (a coverage play) to save his life (evidenced yet again today when he didn’t blitz Stafford AT ALL). How do you not blitz a f—-ing rookie qb (winston) even once when basic common sense (not to mention winstons numbers) is SCREAMING at you that it’s exactly what should be done? Davis is a pathetic DC and needs to be replaced. Name me one superbowl winner since 2000 aside from maybe the ’11 ny giants that didn’t have a very good defensive mind on board as either head coach or DC… I rest my case. Oh and also, davis isn’t the one who built up the secondary/ led it to the success they saw earlier in the season – that would be chip bringing in the players and working closely with new, hand-picked, defensive backs coach cory undlin. Fletcher and Cary Williams aren’t as bad as they played the past two years – their DC is just mentally challenged, that’s all. The late Jim Johnson was extremely adamant about not leaving a defensive back out to dry/ on an island with no help. Oh and he was also real big on blitzing. Davis on the other hand leaves his defensive backs out to dry seemingly every play, and AT THE VERY SAME TIME brings only a 4 man rush. He is an absolute joke of a DC. Yes the offense is having troubles too, but it’s the defense that is truly “quitting” and personally I believe that’s more so due to billy davis than chip (similar to the defense quitting on juan castillo more so than andy reid). That’s just a feeling I have – I may be way off on it but I really don’t think so. And I may be the ONLY person who still believes in chip and wants him to remain the Eagles head coach, but he does needs to realize that billy davis has to go if he wishes to succeed. The defense has (and had in ’13 and ’14 as well) too much talent to play the way they have under davis. Rant over.

    1. No need to apologise at all. Very informed and well written comment, it certainly makes a nice change. I still personally believe in Chip as a coach, not sure if I do as a GM. Thanks for reading the article and sharing a respectful and honest comment!

      1. Anytime, thanks to you as well for being respectful. I do have concerns about chip still, absolutely, and part of that is his GM abilities. But I give him a bit of leniency considering it was his first year with the control over all personnel. Nobody is perfect, he’s bound to make some mistakes. I think it’s kind of telling how some “experts” thought they’d be superbowl bound this year in his first year with the personnel he wants. Just shows how highly some people regard him. I just hope philly fans and their hastiness to fire him just because the first year he has GM control has so far been a bust doesn’t make him grow tired of coaching here/ want out. Heck if parkeys healthy all year (which chip can’t help the fact he suffered a season ending groin injury) and plays even just close to the level he played last year, it’s possible they go 7-3 through the first 10 games (missed fgs/xp vs. atl, wsh, and mia) and none of this talk would be currently going on. Fact is, the kicking game has mostly stunk and they haven’t really caught any breaks in any games that have been the difference between a win or loss (quite the opposite – the other team has caught those breaks). Yes this year’s likely going to be a bust but in no way do I think they should immediately pull the plug because of that

Leave a Reply